v0 testing

Playwright Tests Timing Out on CI Pipeline

Your Playwright end-to-end tests pass consistently in local development but timeout or fail intermittently on CI platforms like GitHub Actions, Vercel, or GitLab CI. Tests that complete in seconds locally take minutes on CI before being killed by the timeout, and the same test suite may pass on one run and fail on the next.

CI environments have significantly fewer resources than developer machines. Shared runners have limited CPU, memory, and no GPU acceleration for browser rendering. Combined with the overhead of starting a Next.js development server and launching browser instances, tests that are fast locally can exceed CI timeouts by a large margin.

V0-generated Playwright configurations often use default settings optimized for local development, not for resource-constrained CI environments where tests run headless on shared infrastructure.

Error Messages You Might See

Test timeout of 30000ms exceeded Page.goto: Timeout 30000ms exceeded waiting for navigation browserType.launch: Failed to launch browser Error: Server not ready after 60s timeout flaky test: passed 2/5 runs
Test timeout of 30000ms exceededPage.goto: Timeout 30000ms exceeded waiting for navigationbrowserType.launch: Failed to launch browserError: Server not ready after 60s timeoutflaky test: passed 2/5 runs

Common Causes

  • Dev server slow to start on CI — next dev takes 30+ seconds on CI runners, causing tests to start before the server is ready
  • Default timeouts too short — Playwright's 30-second default timeout insufficient for CI rendering speeds
  • Too many parallel workers — default worker count matches CPU cores, which overwhelms CI runners with limited resources
  • Browser installation missing — Playwright browsers not cached between CI runs, adding minutes to each pipeline
  • Animations and transitions — CSS animations that complete instantly locally take full duration on underpowered CI
  • Network requests to external services — tests hitting real APIs that are slow or rate-limited from CI IP addresses

How to Fix It

  1. Use production build — run next build then next start instead of next dev for faster, more consistent performance on CI
  2. Increase timeouts — set timeout: 60000 in playwright.config.ts and per-test timeouts for slow operations
  3. Limit workers — set workers: 1 or workers: process.env.CI ? 1 : undefined to prevent resource contention on CI
  4. Cache Playwright browsers — add browser cache to your CI configuration to avoid downloading browsers on every run
  5. Wait for server properly — use webServer: { command: 'next start', url: 'http://localhost:3000', reuseExistingServer: !process.env.CI }
  6. Mock external APIs — use Playwright's route.fulfill() to mock external API responses and eliminate network dependencies

Real developers can help you.

Matthew Jordan Matthew Jordan I've been working at a large software company named Kainos for 2 years, and mainly specialise in Platform Engineering. I regularly enjoy working on software products outside of work, and I'm a huge fan of game development using Unity. I personally enjoy Python & C# in my spare time, but I also specialise in multiple different platform-related technologies from my day job. PawelPloszaj PawelPloszaj I'm fronted developer with 10+ years of experience with big projects. I have small backend background too Basel Issmail Basel Issmail ’m a Senior Full-Stack Developer and Tech Lead with experience designing and building scalable web platforms. I work across the full development lifecycle, from translating business requirements into technical architecture to delivering reliable production systems. My work focuses on modern web technologies, including TypeScript, Angular, Node.js, and cloud-based architectures. I enjoy solving complex technical problems and helping teams turn product ideas and prototypes into working platforms that can grow and scale. In addition to development, I often collaborate closely with product managers, business analysts, designers, and QA teams to ensure that solutions align with both technical and business goals. I enjoy working with startups and product teams where I can contribute both as a hands-on engineer and as a technical partner in designing and delivering impactful software. hanson1014 hanson1014 Full-stack developer experienced in fixing and deploying AI-generated apps from Lovable, Bolt.new, Cursor, and Replit. I specialize in debugging Supabase integration issues (auth flows, RLS policies, database connections), fixing broken deployments, resolving routing/blank screen problems, and cleaning up messy React/Vite codebases. I also build production apps with the Claude API and have shipped a Mac desktop dev tool (Nexterm from scratch. Based in Hong Kong, fast turnaround. Franck Plazanet Franck Plazanet I am a Strategic Engineering Leader with over 8 years of experience building high-availability enterprise systems and scaling high-performing technical teams. My focus is on bridging the gap between complex technology and business growth. Core Expertise: 🚀 Leadership: Managing and coaching teams of 15+ engineers, fostering a culture of accountability and continuous improvement. 🏗️ Architecture: Enterprise Core Systems, Multi-system Integration (ERP/API/ETL), and Core Database Structure. ☁️ Cloud & Scale: AWS Expert; architected systems handling 10B+ monthly requests and managing 100k+ SKUs. 📈 Business Impact: Aligning tech strategy with P&L goals to drive $70k+ in monthly recurring revenue. I thrive on "out-of-the-box" thinking to solve complex technical bottlenecks and am always looking for ways to use automation to improve business productivity. Bastien Labelle Bastien Labelle Full stack dev w/ 20+ years of experience Meïr Ankri Meïr Ankri Full-stack developer specializing in React / Next.js / Node.js with 6+ years of experience. I've worked across various sectors including automotive (Reezocar/Société Générale), healthcare (Medical Link SaaS), and e-commerce (Glasman). I build web apps end-to-end, from architecture to production, with a focus on scalability, performance, and code quality. I also mentor junior developers and contribute to technical decisions and code reviews. Vlad Temian Vlad Temian 15+ years shipping production infrastructure for startups. Former CTO at qed.builders (acquired by The Sandbox). Cursor ambassador and agentic tooling builder. I've scaled systems, automated deployments, and built observability tools for AI coding workflows. I specialize in taking vibe-coded apps from broken prototype to production-ready: fixing Supabase auth/RLS, Stripe integrations, deployment pipelines, and cleaning up AI-generated spaghetti. I build tools in this space (agentprobe, claudebin, micode) and understand both sides: how AI generates code and why it breaks. https://blog.vtemian.com/ Rudra Bhikadiya Rudra Bhikadiya I build and fix web apps across Next.js, Node.js, and DBs. Comfortable jumping into messy code, broken APIs, and mysterious bugs. If your project works in theory but not in reality, I help close that gap. Kingsley Omage Kingsley Omage Fullstack software engineer passionate about AI Agents, blockchain, LLMs.

You don't need to be technical. Just describe what's wrong and a verified developer will handle the rest.

Get Help

Frequently Asked Questions

Why do tests pass locally but fail on CI?

CI runners have less CPU, memory, and no GPU. Tests that complete in milliseconds locally can take seconds on CI. Increase timeouts and reduce parallelism.

How do I cache Playwright browsers on GitHub Actions?

Use actions/cache with key based on playwright version: path: ~/.cache/ms-playwright, key: playwright-${{ hashFiles('package-lock.json') }}.

Should I use next dev or next start for CI tests?

Always use next build && next start for CI. The production build is faster, more consistent, and closer to what users actually experience.

Related v0 Issues

Can't fix it yourself?
Real developers can help.

You don't need to be technical. Just describe what's wrong and a verified developer will handle the rest.

Get Help